Note: I take the title of this post from that of the video below. And it’s worth pondering. “The battle to end all wars!” rather than being hyperbole, may just be correct, if it’s true that annuals-based agriculture necessarily depletes soil and thus requires periodic migration or conquering of of new territory (land) in order to grow food.
Update: When I posted this to fb, I immediately received this insightful comment immediately. Thanks, Ray!
Yesterday’s post, on the remarkable response of I presume an army of young, enthusiastic, imagination-fired permies to one woman’s question about how to eradicate a “pokewood forest” made me want to feature more on this subject of perennial vs. annual in thinking about how to grow food. It’s especially exciting to me to imagine the growing army of young people inspired by permaculture’s hope for the future responding to very real needs everywhere for a total transformation in our way of life. For example (and I think I’ve used it before): in Thailand, a country that is 95% Buddhist, the educational centers are the Buddhist monasteries. At least some of them have land that could be used to grow food. Voila! Imagine: young permaculturists from all over the world drifting like spores into monasteries to work side by side with young monks, hands in the dirt, faces in the sun, smiles all around.
Here’s one article (thanks, Keith):
The perennial imperative: Breaking the land-abuse spiral of annual agriculture
And here’s a fun and extremely informative video that really gets into the “meat” of the whole question of how Nature manages to be so successful. As perennials pioneer Wes Jackson, founder of the Land Institute (Kansas), concludes: