[searchandfilter fields="search,category,post_tag"]

David Wilcock: Is “Polar Vortex” a physical out-picturing of inner chilling re: NSA surveillance?

Unknown-1As much as I always look forward to David Wilcock’s monthly or bi-monthly overview reports, I’m nearly as often disappointed by what to me is an embarrassingly narcissistic extended advertorial slant. This new one is no exception, with its single piece of dot-connecting information in the title and buttressed by numerous pictures of news headlines on NSA surveillance with the word “chilling” in them.

I’m more likely to assume that the fact that “they” have named it “Polar Vortex,” along with naming winter storms (the last one to hit was called “Janus”) means that these storms and this cold is being engineered to create fear, confusion, and chaos, as usual. How? HAARP and chemtrails combined? Something else? Who knows. But there’s high drama in the sky.

Which reminds me: there’s a post circulating today that says an enormous craft landed on the moon. However, it comes from a January 18th piece on Turner Radio Network, which to me, alerts it as possible disinfo. On the other hand, Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot is also promoting it. So who knows?

Back to Wilcock. When he’s good, he’s very very good; I know no one who can connect so many dots across such a great range of subjects and dimensions. Which makes me forgive him for annoying me the rest of the time.

The Polar Vortex: A Physical Manifestation of the “Chilling Effect” of NSA Surveillance?

15 thoughts on “David Wilcock: Is “Polar Vortex” a physical out-picturing of inner chilling re: NSA surveillance?”

  1. Thank you for this excellent comment, Ann. It sums up perfectly the reasons why David’s posts do NOT appear on my site. I also agree with your take on the Turner network post re the object on the moon. However, as they did take the time to include images, dates and times I took the risk and published the article. Thanks for letting me know Cassidy is also posting info on this. I shall visit her site immediately.

    Blessings,
    Gillian

    1. So hard to know what is what, eh? Like trying to sail in a straight line and having to tack into the wind. Thanks, Gillian for your comment and info. I’ll revisit the moon object business, maybe tomorrow?

          1. Yes, the MainStream Miasma has been stating that for some time now. It is certainly a possibility though I can’t imagine how every single image captured by multiple different cameras – including Google Earth – could distort something so similarly across the board. G

          2. I guess what got me skeptical in the first place was the idea that something so 3D massive would travel vast distances using what might be, to any society advanced enough to create that structure, possibly old-fashioned methods of propulsion (i.e., not just beaming from one place to another instantly, interdimensionally). But what do I know?

          3. My thought precisely. Which is why I doubt IF (big if) this is real that these are friendlies. One must also consider Project Bluebeam. Given the desperate financial straights of our controllers it would be just the type of deflection toward an external enemy supposedly threatening all of humanity that they’d pull out of their rapidly-emptying bag of tricks. Misdirection and deflection, is, after all, the name of their game. G

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Help this blog live!

exopermaculture

Archives

Categories

Most Viewed Posts

Recent Comments

August 15, 2021 at 10:27 pm
Thank You, Sydney and Team Kraken, for…
August 15, 2021 at 2:09 am
Are the spores to the pesticide, available…
August 9, 2021 at 6:44 pm
Will check out this reference. Thanks!
August 9, 2021 at 5:59 pm
The fact that a bunch of psychopaths…
August 9, 2021 at 5:05 pm
Fixed. Thank you!
Scroll to Top