Ronald Bernard testifies again. Hard to swallow; hard to fathom; immensely courageous and compassionate.

If the original Ronald Bernard testimony was itself astonishing, then this time he goes deeper, testifying about the abuse he endured in childhood — extreme physical abuse from father, extreme sexual abuse in a Catholic facility — that filled him with hatred for the entire human race and led to him describing himself as a “terrorist.”

From there to his “rise through the ranks” of this corrupt society starting at age 20, using “covers” — like import/export businesses, used car lots — to hide criminal activities, and then switching to becoming a money changer, making money with money, and meanwhile, being groomed for the Satanic abuse that he would be expected to perform as a up-and-coming member of the financial “elite”: sacrificing small children. This is where, remarkably, given his horrific background, he drew the line, and withdrew from the corrupt world that he had been a part of; he then spent eight years incognito, before re-entering the world, this time as a whistleblower.

To me, what’s most remarkable about Ronald Bernard’s testimony is how he recognizes and treasures the wounded child inside each person, no matter how evil or hateful he has become.

And I would beg to differ with his conclusion that he is, at this point, “healed.” For if my own life is any indication, and I suffered not one iota as much as he did early on, the healing process is lifelong.

But, for those who don’t necessarily trust Ronald Bernard, see this:

I just quit working for Dutch whistleblower Ronald Bernard — here’s why

And, I would add, check out the comment section to this piece, especially the extended rebuttal by “gcuccureddu.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Ronald Bernard testifies again. Hard to swallow; hard to fathom; immensely courageous and compassionate.

  1. spACE says:

    The link you leave at the bottom leads to one of the most stupid, childishly reactive blog (unsubstantiated opinion) by a so-called “reporter” who sounds like a little brat having a tantrum because criminals won’t leave their 1970-1980’s illegal job C.V.’s on the internet so she can quickly use google to “research” for her “reporting”. Give me a break!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *