I’m beginning to get pissed that we are all still being held in thrall by the latest “mass shooting by lone gunman.” It really does seem as if “they” want us to pay close attention to the proliferating contradictions — ignoring everything else, all the perfidy “they” are up to elsewhere — to the point where our logical brains just explode and we drop into confusion, malaise, impotence — and beg for relief. From whom? From “the authorities,” of course, who, as usual, trotted out the official narrative almost immediately; once we give up and “beLIEve” it, we are marched that much closer to being mind-controlled forever into the clanking, centralized Deep Police State.
So let’s not “give up,” okay? Instead, while remaining very much aware of the cunundrums within the latest Deep State Drama, let’s devote our attention to building the new world within the ashes of the old.
Here are two (final?) perspectives, both of which I very much appreciate.
Paul Craig Roberts claims he doesn’t know, if this massacre was a false flag, nor, he claims, will we ever know, given what has happened to investigative journalism in the past few decades. However . . . he then details (some of) the numerous weird anomalies:
Meanwhile, from aim4truth, this educational syllabus of “false flag markers” that utilizes this shooting event as an example. Given their headline, the authors clearly do conclude it was a false flag.