Charlie Hebdo false flag motivation, Paul Craig Roberts version: Cui bono? The U.S! — and much more.

Image: www.raintoday.com

Image: www.raintoday.com

If Kevin Barrett fingers Israel, Paul Craig Roberts fingers the U.S.

Charlie Hebdo And Tsarnaev’s Trial: Qui Bono?

Excerpt:

Another way of seeing the attack is as an attack designed to shore up France’s vassal status to Washington. The suspects can be both guilty and patsies. Just remember all the terrorist plots created by the FBI that served to make the terrorism threat real to Americans. http://reason.com/blog/2014/07/22/human-rights-watch-all-of-the-high-profi

France is suffering from the Washington-imposed sanctions against Russia. Shipyards are impacted from being unable to deliver Russian orders due to France’s vassalage status to Washington, and other aspects of the French economy are being adversely impacted by sanctions that Washington forced its NATO puppet states to apply to Russia.
This week the French president said that the sanctions against Russia should end (so did the German vice-chancellor).

This is too much foreign policy independence on France’s part for Washington. Has Washington resurrected “Operation Gladio,” which consisted of CIA bombing attacks against Europeans during the post-WW II era that Washington blamed on communists and used to destroy communist influence in European elections? Just as the world was led to believe that communists were behind Operation Gladio’s terrorist attacks, Muslims are blamed for the attacks on the French satirical magazine.

The Roman question is always: Who benefits? The answer is: Not France, not Muslims, but US world hegemony. US hegemony over the world is what the CIA supports. US world hegemony is the neoconservative-imposed foreign policy of the US.

According to National Public Radio, Charlie Hebdo is about free speech. The US has free speech, claim NPR’s pundits, but terrorists have taken it away from the French.

Just how does the US have free speech when NY Times reporter James Risen was psychologically put on the rack to force him to reveal his source, despite the fact that Risen and his source are protected by the US Constitution and whistleblower protections. Clearly, in the US “national security” has trumped everything else.

“National security” has nothing to do with national security. It has only to do with protecting the criminals in the US government from accountability for their crimes. Every time you hear Washington invoke “national security,” you know for a 100% fact that the government has committed yet another crime. National security is the cloak for Washington’s criminal operations. “National security” prevents the government’s crimes from coming to light and, thereby, protects government from accountability.

____

Hmmm. Israel or the U.S.? But then, we might ask, who is who here, and who’s the boss? I googled that question. Here’s one version of an answer, from last August; remember that incident, the arrogant, cheeky Netanyahu “Don’t second guess me!” remark to Obama? Feels like ancient history now.

America: Who is the Boss?

But then this is all ancient history, re-enacted over and over again, one bloody incident after another, some ramped up by controlled MSM international news, some not, depending on what’s at stake, I imagine. Yep! It’s all my imagination, fed by all sorts of sources, running like rivulets towards some kind of river of unimaginable proportions that sludges downstream into the warming, radioactive, plasticized oceans of the collective unconscious.

Here’s one piece of “terrorist” news, for example, involving much bigger bloody numbers, that ISN’T being trumpeted right now.

The Massive Terrorist Attacks Hardly Anyone Is Talking About

Of course no single person has the “final” identification, description, or interpretation of any of this, since the entire global geopolitical situation is so complex, labyrinthian, knotted, tangled, competing lines of force all attracting/repelling each other, showering bloody sparks . . . Yuck!

Breathe, Ann, breathe.

Oh, and here’s an interesting analysis of what the author calls the self-defeating “Red Queen” effect of terrorism. Helps my “far-out” eye pull back, get perspective.

The Red Queen’s Trap

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *