Post-Sentencing Statements: 84-year-old Sr. Megan Rice and her Codefendants

To remain in prison for the rest of my life would be the greatest honor this court could bestow on me.” incorrigible peace activist Sr. Megan Rice


fruit-of-justice-tnp-615x615

Excerpted from —

Plowshares Sentencing Shows U.S. Government Afraid of Peace Activists

February 21, 2014

by Jim Habor

commondreams

After being read their sentences, each of the three defendants were allowed to make statements. Michael Walli explained that many things in this world, like nuclear weapons and concentration camps, should never have existed, but were deemed legal by those in power. He challenged the assertion that his 40 arrests and over 20 convictions indicated an unrepentant disregard for the law. “I acted consistent with the rule of law,” he declared, pointing out that the United States breaks the law all the time, and far more seriously at that.

Greg Boertje-Obed quoted Martin Luther King, Jr. and presented a copy of his “Beyond Vietnam” speech to the prosecution, which — earlier in the trial — had challenged him when he quoted King as having called the United States “the greatest purveyor of violence today.” Boertje-Obed also read from Daniel Berrigan’s Hymn to the New Humanity. His voice raised in volume and passion when he said, “The United States, if it would respect [the nonproliferation treaty] would promote the rule of law.”

Sr. Rice was at her most eloquent when addressing the court. “The problem with this trial is that people don’t know the law,” she said. “There is an alternative to nuclear weapons — common sense… If you resist nuclear weapons, you are upholding the law… The need to expose crimes pushed us to our action… To remain in prison for the rest of my life would be the greatest honor this court could bestow on me.”

She pointed out that nuclear weapons were declared illegal under international law and hence aren’t “legitimate property.” Additionally, the three members of the Transform Now Plowshares felt called to uphold their view of God’s law, and called for love and peacemaking, rather than nuclear threats and war.

Yet, these motivations were never allowed to be spoken during the trial itself, thereby preventing the jury from truly understanding their actions. As unjust as this — and the harsh sentences — may seem, it shows that the government actually sees civil resistance and organizing for the power and capacity it truly represents. The powers that be should be afraid of the likes of the Transform Now Plowshares. They’re not alone.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Post-Sentencing Statements: 84-year-old Sr. Megan Rice and her Codefendants

  1. Pamela says:

    No, they are not. There are many. I am one.
    The term “incorrigible” was bestowed upon me at age 14. I wasn’t there for processing when my parents tried to lock me in a girl’s reformatory until I was 21. I was such a criminal!
    I skipped school to commune with nature, wore black arm bands in protest of the Vietnam War, and told people the US should be ashamed for stealing the land of the Native Americans. I hung out with an African American boy, and in small town Nebraska, I made the minister red-faced furious when I informed him he was wrong about God – “a loving God would not allow atrocities.”
    Let us continue to be aware, to question, to be incorrigible.
    Thanks for your help in doing just that, Ann.

    • I’m so impressed by people like you who know who they are early on and never let go. I was crushed by my Dad when he came home from the war (who knows what demons he carried), and didn’t really wake up and come alive until I was 26. However, the nun, in 7th grade, called me a “pert little snip.” Then, I felt mortified. Now I treasure that remark. So good for you, Pamela!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *