Joel Salatin’s infuriating epiphany: Why do we need more farmers? To provide (human) meat for the military.

joel-Salatin-4

I know the title I put on this piece sounds sensational. So is the reality, if Joel Salatin’s meeting with U. S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack can be believed. And it can, since Joel Salatin, of Polyface Farms,

— a family owned, multi-generational, pasture-based, beyond organic, local-market farm and informational outreach in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley —

can certainly be believed: “That America’s farms are viewed by our leaders as just another artery leading into military might is unspeakably demeaning and disheartening.”

MUST READ from Joel Salatin of Polyface Farm

August 18, 2013

by Joel Salatin

“Why do we need more farmers? What is the driving force behind USDA policy? In an infuriating epiphany I have yet to metabolize, I found out Wednesday in a private policy-generation meeting with Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Terry McCauliffe. I did and still do consider it a distinct honor for his staff to invite me as one of the 25 dignitaries in Virginia Agriculture for this think-tank session in Richmond.

It was a who’s who of Virginia agriculture: Farm Bureau, Va. Agribusiness Council, Va. Forestry Association, Va. Poultry Federation, Va. Cattlemen’s Assoc., deans from Virginia Tech and Virginia State — you get the picture. It was the first meeting of this kind I’ve ever attended that offered no water. The only thing to drink were soft drinks. Lunch was served in styrofoam clam shells — Lay’s potato chips, sandwiches, potato salad and chocolate chip cookie. It didn’t look very safe to me, so I didn’t partake. But I’d have liked a drink of water. In another circumstance, I might eat this stuff, but with these folks, felt it important to make a point. Why do they all assume nobody wants water, nobody cares about styrofoam, everybody wants potato chips and we all want industrial meat-like slabs on white bread?

But I digress. The big surprise occurred a few minutes into the meeting: US Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack walked in. He was in Terry McCauliffe love-in mode. And here is what he told us: for the first time—2012— rural America lost population in real numbers—not as a percentage but in real numbers. It’s down to 16 percent of total population.

I’m sitting there thinking he’s going to say that number needs to go up so we have more people to love and steward the landscape. More people to care for earthworms. More people to grow food and fiber. Are you ready for the shoe to drop? The epiphany? What could the US Secretary of Agriculture, at the highest strategic planning sessions of our land, be challenged by other leaders to change this figure, to get more people in rural America, to encourage farming and help more farms get started? What could be the driving reason to have more farmers?

Why does he go to bed at night trying to figure out how to increase farmers? How does the President and other cabinet members view his role as the nation’s farming czar? What could be the most important contribution that increasing farmers could offer to the nation? Better food? Better soil development? Better care for animals? Better care for plants?

Are you ready? Here’s his answer: although rural America only has 16 percent of the population, it gives 40 percent of the personnel to the military. Say what? You mean when it’s all said and done, at the end of the day, the bottom line — you know all the cliches — the whole reason for increasing farms is to provide cannon fodder for American imperial might. He said rural kids grow up with a sense of wanting to give something back, and if we lose that value system, we’ll lose our military might.

So folks, it all boils down to American military muscle. It’s not about food, healing the land, stewarding precious soil and resources; it’s all about making sure we keep a steady stream of youngsters going into the military. This puts an amazing twist on things. You see, I think we should have many more farmers, and have spent a lifetime trying to encourage, empower, and educate young people to go into farming. It never occurred to me that this agenda was the key to American military power.

Lest I be misread, I am not opposed to defending family. I am not opposed to fighting for sacred causes. I am violently opposed to non-sacred fighting and meddling in foreign countries, and building empires. The Romans already tried that and failed.

But to think that my agenda is key to building the American military — now that’s a cause for pause. I will redouble my efforts to help folks remember why we need more farmers. It’s not to provide cannon fodder for Wall Street imperialistic agendas. It’s to grow food that nourishes, land that’s aesthetically and aromatically sensually romantic, build soil, hydrate raped landscapes, and convert more solar energy into biomass than nature would in a static state. I can think of many, many righteous and noble reasons to have more farms.

Why couldn’t he have mentioned any of these? Any?

No, the reason for more farms is to make sure we get people signing up at the recruitment office. That’s the way he sees me as a farmer. Not a food producer. When the president and his cabinet have their private conflabs, they don’t see farmers as food producers, as stewards of the landscape, as resource leveragers. No, they view us as insurance for military muscle, for American empire building and soldier hubris. Is this
outrageous? Do I have a right to be angry? Like me, this raw and bold show of the government’s farming agenda should make us all feel betrayed, belittled, and our great nation besmirched.

Perhaps, just perhaps, really good farms don’t feed this military personnel pipeline. I’d like to think our kind of farming has more righteous goals and sacred objectives. Vilsack did not separate good farmers from bad farmers. Since we have far more bad farmers than good ones, perhaps the statistic would not hold up if we had more farmers who viewed the earth as something to heal instead of hurt, as a partner to caress instead of rape. That America’s farms are viewed by our leaders as just another artery leading into military might is unspeakably demeaning and disheartening.

Tragically, I don’t think this view would change with a different Democrat or Republican. It’s entrenched in the establishment fraternity. Thomas Jefferson, that iconic and quintessential agrarian intellectual, said we should have a revolution about every half century just to keep the government on its toes. I’d say we’re long overdue.

Now when you see those great presidentially appointed cabinet members talking, I just want you to think about how despicable it is that behind the facade, behind the hand shaking and white papers, in the private by-invitation-only inner circles of our country, movers and shakers know axiomatically that farms are really important to germinate more military personnel. That no one in that room with Terry McCauliffe, none of those Virginia farm leaders, even blinked when he said that is still hard for me to grasp. They accepted it as truth, probably saying “Amen, brother” in their hearts. True patriots, indeed.

It’ll take me awhile to get over this, and believe me, I intend to shout this from the housetops. I’ll incorporate in as many public speeches as I can because I think it speaks to the heart of food and farming. It speaks to the heart of strength and security; which according to our leaders comes from the end of a gun, not from the alimentary canal of an earthworm. Here’s to more healthy worms.

This entry was posted in 2013, culture of secrecy, dark doo-doo, new economy, unity consciousness, Uranus square Pluto, visions of the future, waking up, wild new ideas. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Joel Salatin’s infuriating epiphany: Why do we need more farmers? To provide (human) meat for the military.

  1. Tom Stoker says:

    I remember when I was a farm kid. My dad was only a “part-time” (ha ha) farmer, since he also had a job in town. I sometimes worked for wages on my uncle’s bigger farm in the summers so I could buy my own new clothes for school in the fall. One time I was riding in my uncle’s pickup when we stopped for the only traffic light (at that time) in the center of Burley, Idaho. My uncle was explaining something to me and didn’t notice the light turn green. Someone behind us honked and shouted loudly, ” Step on it! Ya dumb farmer!” My uncle almost blew a gasket in anger, and not about being honked at and shouted at—it was all because of the epithet “dumb” used in reference to farmers. My uncle referred to this incident for years afterward, and seemed to live his life to prove that farmers ain’t dumb—his farm became one of the largest and most prosperous in all of Cassia County (not that this necessarily proves the point, I understand now, but he tried).
    Farmers have long been one of the most patriotic last bastions of “traditional” American spirit and “family” values, ever since the “first” Thanksgiving. American farmers have been digging in ever since sodbusters began to put up barbwire fences to keep the damn range cows (and even wilder damn cowboys) out of their domain. Even in the mountains, staid farmers labored to feed the rowdy gold miners and lumberjacks.

    Having lived and worked on both sides of the fences now, I can understand this farmer’s outrage, similar to my uncle’s years ago, at farmers being viewed as basically dumb breeders of children to send to war as dumb robots for the military.

    Tragically, “the rest of the story” is not that simple. Cowboys, ranchers, miners, lumberjacks, and most Americans are now in the same basket as the poor farmers—fodder for the entire military-industrial-financial corporate empire to feed on.

    C’mon People, it’s time to REBEL and TRANSFORM this truly DUMB system we support blindly while it eats us up, inside and outside.

  2. Gary Harris says:

    It sounds like this was a first time event and an effort by the organizers to include all players was obvious as Joel was invited? He was one of the attendees that did not speak up where it would have the most impact. That was a lost opportunity Joel. The oversight of ,or choice of no bottled water, the choice of food? Your criticism was harsh and based on a life style choice? If your attendance was as as a representative of earth friendly people you let us down. You reported giving no input? We all unfortunately go to meetings with meals of rubber chicken and worse. As for the stats on rural youth in the military I would say it is a culture issue. Some cultures need to find and slay demons. The white bread eaters, city folk and government are not the demons and to take a statistic and then cry of a conspiracy on your ride home? Then call for a revolution? Perhaps Joel you could water what you want to grow, nurture the human garden.

  3. Ruth Anne says:

    “What if they had a war, and nobody came?” We have a choice. I think it’s time for a revitalization of the anti-war movement. Nobody’s children should be fodder for the kind of wars we have these days. The clarity of how the government feels about it’s citizens really comes through with this experience. How depressing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *