When in doubt, ask: “What would Nature do?”

Not sure why Van Gelder couches her thesis so coyly. What does she mean “progress isn’t always for the better?” What do she mean, “Sometimes nature’s original idea was a better one.” Of course Nature knows what she’s doing. In place of the “progress” and artifice demanded by human hierarchies, Nature offers open-sourced, self-organizing, ever-replenishing systems with no end and no beginning. We can join her. We can remember that we are co-equal participants in the process of creation. While we’re at it, let’s banish these two quotes, both from the “holy Bible”:

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.” Genesis 1:28

God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them: “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be on every beast of the earth, on every bird of the air, on all that move on the earth, and on all the fish of the sea. They are given into your hand.”‘ Genesis 9 1-2

To Change Our Direction, It’s Time to Follow Nature’s Lead

It takes humility to recognize that what we’ve called progress isn’t always for the better. Sometimes nature’s original idea was a better one.

November 26, 2012

Photo by Vladimir Konovalov

I live among Chief Seattle’s people, and one of the things I’ve learned from this experience is humility.

I say, “I’ve lived here 12 years—longer than I’ve lived anywhere!” And then I look around at the ancient petroglyphs and the shell middens that whiten the beaches, and I remember that my neighbors’ ancestors have lived here for thousands of years.
 I talk about the growing divide in our society between the 1 percent and the
 99 percent. Then I’m invited to a potlatch, where a seafood feast is followed by an outpouring of gift giving. Ah yes, these people figured out centuries ago that inequality upsets the delicate balances that allow societies to thrive. So instead of gaining status from accumulating stuff, they earn respect by giving it away.

One of the old stories tells of a time when people and animals were on equal foot
ing, and they were all hungry. They made 
a wager. Whichever side won a game of chance could eat the other. Humans won, but not by much. There’s humility in that story, too—it could have gone the other way.

When the Suquamish Tribe began making its way out of the devastation caused by having their land taken away and their culture suppressed, one of their first priorities was to restore habitat for salmon and shellfish. The tribe, with its staff of biologists, is now among the most relentless forces for clean water and fish habitat in this area.

When a nearby saltwater bay was closed to shellfish harvesting because of pollution, I figured cleaning up that bay would be too difficult. Just harvest somewhere else!
 But tribal leaders saw it differently, and now I do, too. Each place is sacred—even places dominated by strip malls, industry, and parking lots. Nature doesn’t write off parts of the Earth, and neither can we. This place we live is all we have. There is no place “else.”

After years of patient work, that bay is now clean; tribal members go out on the sandy flats at low tide with buckets and digging forks and bring home shellfish for themselves—and to share.
It takes humility to recognize that what we’ve called progress isn’t always for the better and that sometimes nature’s original idea was a better one. Here are some of the lessons I’ve learned over years living among the Suquamish people and months asking “What would nature do?”

  • Nature works in cycles. There is no place to throw things “away.” When nature’s systems are working, every kind of waste nourishes another part of the system. We humans can produce that way, too.
  • Nature is a self-organizing and adaptive network of relationships. Except when these relationships are disrupted, this network generates yet more life and relationships, in forms that are competitive and cooperative, and unimaginably diverse.
  • Nature uses current energy (mostly from the sun), not fossil energy. And it doesn’t draw down the principal of the Earth’s largess. It lives off the interest. That means it can continue indefinitely.

I grew up in a culture that claimed the right to conquer, use up, and displace nature. Human intelligence coupled with technology would take us on a one-way trip to a brighter future, we were told.

Today, as we reach the limits of what life on Earth can tolerate, we need a little less hubris and a little more humility. If we learn from nature and from our indigenous brothers and sisters, I now believe we’ll have a much better shot at that bright future.


Sarah van Gelder wrote this article for What Would Nature Do?, the Winter 2013 issue of YES! Magazine.

Sarah van Gelder

Sarah van Gelder is co-founder and executive editor of YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. She is also editor of the new book: “This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement.”

This entry was posted in 2012, free energy, new economy, permaculture principles, Reality Ramp-Up, unity consciousness, visions of the future, waking up, wild new ideas. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to When in doubt, ask: “What would Nature do?”

  1. Great article. It takes a native american to be honest enough, conscious enough to point out that scriptures which are unnatural are also untrue!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *