More on 9/11 "truth" and "truthers" — my friend Rob, me, and Fred Burks

Received this via email today from Rob, a friend who now lives elsewhere:

. . . been following your blog, and i seem to be sliding in deeper to the rabbit hole, trying my best to keep grounded, while ‘following my bliss’ and chasing down all sorts of kooky crazy things in the world that capture my attention.

anyway, wanted to comment on your post about free energy and 9/11. could be- i don’t know. one counter-argument i’ve heard, though, is: this is an example of disinfo. the idea, maybe of folks like AE911, is some hypotheses are so implausible and unfounded that they serve to discredit any investigation of alternate stories by painting them with a ‘crazy’ brush. that when you argue for a holographic plane or a weaponized free energy, and that’s easily debunked, then you’re left behind with the official story as the best, most adequate story. what do you think?

Geez, what do I think? I think I have no idea what to think. And BTW: the same two people who speak of free energy weapons hitting the towers (see this post) also speak of the planes as “simulated.”

I wanted to put that post up primarily to stimulate and provoke even more questions about 9/11 and especially, to emphasize the psyops narrative initiated by the event. What really interests me is the idea that anytime an official reason, motive, perp, etc. is ascribed to a given event or situation or, maybe we should say, “node in a vibrational field,” then it may be that an (official, but secret) “controlled opposition” reason, motive, perp, etc. is dropped into the field at the same time as a seed to be watered in the future.

In other words, since we live in this 3D plan of duality, “they” (whoever they are) give us not just one point (in this case, the planes “caused” it), but the point opposite it (no, demolition “caused” it), so that we stay inside the limits of that one axis, not seeking to perceive what might be true aside from it. If you see that axis as the diameter of a circle, then what about the infinity of diameters that also flow through the center of that circle from the infinity of points that lie upon its circumference?

With the post in question, the idea that the “controlled opposition” would be “demolition” sets up the other point of the dualistic axis (the first point being “hijacked planes”) created by the narrative. That way they, whoever they are, can control the conversation, frame it up in a certain very limited manner, put blinkers on it, so that we see-saw back and forth between demotion and hijacking, paying no attention to the space within and aside from which that duality exists, because anything outside the line created by that duality is officially set up to be, by definition, “crazy.” Get it?

I’m mostly interested in epistemology, in how we think, and the frameworks that set our thinking into certain energetic fields with seemingly impermeable boundaries, when ultimately, no matter what we say about anything, we can also say something else that opposes it. Any proof, as my teacher used to say, rests on nothing. It is merely a form, a posit in the void. So, let’s play in the void and realize it, have fun with it; let’s recognize that all boundaries are permeable and let’s move through them all to dwell in the ocean of the One.

The main thing is, to generate more and more skepticism about “what really happened on 9/11,” since that event and the psyops narrative that it does seem to have set in motion may have condensed into the cornerstone of our entire dog-eat-dog so-called “civilization.” If all us little people pick away at the 9/11 cornerstone, we may be able to bring the whole stinking thing down. Then, the fresh start that is already being so valiantly intiated by permaculture and other sustainable practices that share the values of care and connection rather than isolation and control will jumpkick to fast forward in the blink of an eye.

As the scales fall, humanity is set free.

Meanwhile, here’s‘s Fred Burks, his declaration that he’s also a 9/11 “truther.” Whether or not Fred subscribes to the demotion theory, I have no idea. Nor do I care to research the subject.

Dear friends,

I am a supporter of the 9/11 truth movement. I may not be very outspoken about this to some of you, but as we arrive at the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, I now want to declare myself to you, to all my friends, and to the entire world. I write also to invite you to join me in building a better world.

If you are at all triggered by this, I invite you to take a deep breath and hold an open mind before reading on. If you are a supporter of the 9/11 movement, I invite you to join me and declare yourself, too. I invite you to do this either by forwarding this message to all of your friends with a note of support at the top, or by writing a similar message of your own with an invitation for all of us to declare ourselves openly. Let us join together in letting the world know the vast numbers of us who question the official story of 9/11 and support this noble movement.

I am writing this message not only to declare myself and invite others to do the same, but even more so to show you the numbers of highly respected people from a wide variety of professions who have publicly declared themselves, stating that the 9/11 Commission Report was filled with omissions and distortions, and that we need a new, independent investigation. Did you know that the numbers who have joined the 9/11 truth movement now include:

  • Over 200 senior military and government officials
  • Over 250 pilots and aviation professionals
  • Over 300 9/11 survivors and family members
  • Over 400 respected professors
  • Over 1,500 architects and engineers

You can read the name, profession, and statements with links for verification for every one of these people on the great website at Included are U.S. Senators, members of Congress, a former president of Italy,military generals, and many more. And there are thousands more of this stature who are not willing to go public yet, or who simply have not contacted the above website to share their information. For a more concise listing of revealing statements made by the top 50 senior government officials and over 100 respected professors, click here and here.

The media greatly underplays the number and quality of people involved in the 9/11 movement. Neither do they give much coverage to the solid, verifiable evidence of complicity that we have accumulated. For how and why the major media has largely failed to report on this, click here.

I am writing to all of you as one who has carefully researched the abundant evidence surrounding 9/11 from reliable, verifiable sources and come to the conclusion that certain rogue elements within the U.S. government were very likely involved in the attacks. Though this idea may be disturbing for you to entertain, consider that if what I and many others are saying is true, we place ourselves in great peril by not seriously considering the evidence.

The motive for certain rogue government elements in manipulating the events of 9/11 is fairly obvious. Without the 9/11 attacks, we almost certainly would never have spent trillions of dollars on two major wars and beefing up national security, which I’m sure you know has greatly padded the pockets of some of the richest individuals and corporations in the world. For a Washington Post article showing over $3 trillion in Iraq War spending alone, click here. For the comments of a top U.S. general on major manipulations to keep us at war, click here.

Some of you may not know that I graduated a valedictorian from high school, graduated with honors and a 3.8 GPA from college, received numerous awards and scholarships for my studies, and went on to became the U.S. Department of State’stop Indonesian language interpreter. I eventually had the honor of personally interpreting for Bill Clinton, G.W. Bush and many other top government officials from around the world. I share this only to show that I have some credibility in these matters.

To read the story of how I became aware of the likelihood of a major cover-up on the day of 9/11 and, even more importantly, why I am optimistic about our future, click here. To explore some of the abundance of reliable, verifiable information available suggesting a major cover-up, see the 9/11 Information Center at this link. This webpage includes links to some of the best videos, major media articles, government documents, and more which are the basis of the 9/11 movement.

Though this information may be scary and difficult to digest for some, I invite you to consider this as a golden opportunity for us to work together for a better world. Please join me not only in calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11, but also in working towards a brighter future for all of us. Contact your friends and your political and media representatives to let them know where you stand. I have no doubt that when we come together on vital matters like this, we can make a difference and transform our world for the better. Thanks for caring, and have a good day.

With very best wishes and hopes for a brighter future,
Fred Burks
Former White House language interpreter and founder of PEERS and

Note: This message is also available online at this link.

This entry was posted in culture of secrecy, dark doo-doo, elder wisdom, local action, new economy, Pluto in Capricorn, Reality Ramp-Up, time acceleration, unity consciousness, Uranus in Aries, Uranus square Pluto, visions of the future, waking up, wild new ideas, zone zero. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *