Back in the early ’70s, my friends and I lived in communes; we vowed, in a joking manner, that when we got old we’d return to communes, no matter what happened in between. Our fond visions of sitting in rockers on a big old farm wrap-around porch at dusk, talking, playing music, “hanging out” like we used to — these visions were, at times, what kept me going during the confusing and soul-destroying maelstrom of materialism that swamped our world for so long.
At 68, for me, the time has come to return to the vision. I”m a bit more “sophisticated” now, wanting to transform my neighborhood into an ecovillage, but the ideas of sharing space and sharing lives — tools, work parties, services, skills — that ’60s longing to connect with heart and soul, remains not only intact, but as a deep thrumming for community to rebalance this American land of frontier “individualists.”
For a bit of my own effort locally, checkout the goings on at our Green Acres Neighborhood Garden. And check out the new website for our still forming Green Acres Neighborhood Ecovillage, the values and objectives of which are based on the neighborhood plan that the Green Acres Neighborhood Association developed with the city of Bloomington Planning Department, four years ago. We begin our tiny ecovillage with three houses and their occupants, next door and across the street from each other. One small node of conscious connectedness within an existing neighborhood.
I have a feeling that the ideas in the two-year-old article which follows are going to become more and more common as the dollar continues to lose value, food and energy costs continue to rise, jobs fall away even more steeply, and the environment and our infrastructure deteriorate even further.
“Come together, NOW,” I’d say. Don’t wait. The longer we wait, the more difficult it will be.
Thanks to alternet.org.
By Alexander Zaitchik
March 6, 2009
It all happened faster than you can say “senior discount.”
Millions of baby boomers born into the dawn of the most spectacular economic expansion in history are being forced to re-imagine their retirement futures. Few news outlets have failed to seize upon the low-hanging pun: the boomers have gone bust.
Among the adjustments forced by the new circumstances, perhaps the cruelest twist for many boomers is the need to join younger generations in the roommate queue. The housing crash has forced record numbers of late-middle age homeowners to take in boarders or risk becoming boarders themselves. From California to Vermont, home-share organizations founded to assist the elderly are scrambling to meet the demands of newly bust boomers.
“In the last few months we’ve experienced explosive growth in interest by homeowners age 50-plus to find rooms and roommates,” says Jacqueline Grossmann, Chicago coordinator for the National Shared Housing Resource Center. “The trend now is getting younger and younger. People in their 50s and 60s are losing their nest eggs and increasingly willing to give up their privacy in exchange for rents of $500, $600 a month.”
“We’ve seen a 400 percent increase over the last few months of people nearing retirement age,” says Rita Zadoff, director of Housemate Match, a shared-housing program serving the Atlanta area. “We haven’t been this busy since we helped Katrina victims find housing.”
Kirby Dunn of Home Share Vermont reports a “huge increase” of boomers seeking roommates in the last six months. “There has been a dramatic shift from elderly clients seeking a ‘protective presence’ to younger people with ‘too much house’ seeking financial help to make mortgage and utility payments,” she says.
Most of the nation’s home-share organizations were set up with the disabled and seniors in mind. They now appeal to bust boomers because they are generally free services that screen potential housemates carefully. “Older people aren’t comfortable finding roommates through Craigslist,” says Zadoff. “They aren’t as used to the idea of letting strangers into their homes.”
Boomers are maximizing room occupancy for the same reason that their kids in their 20s and 30s are still competing for the best group rentals on Craigslist: they’re broke.
The extent to which boomer wealth was based on home values is highlighted by a new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research, entitled “The Wealth of the Baby Boom Cohorts After the Collapse of the Housing Bubble.” The report details how the collapse has left the majority of those around retirement-age almost completely reliant on entitlements. The net worth of median households in the 45 to 54 age bracket has dropped by more than 45 percent since 2004, to just over $80,000. Households headed by those aged 55 to 64, meanwhile, have lost 38 percent of net wealth.
“The collapse of the housing bubble has already destroyed almost $6 trillion dollars in housing wealth for homeowners,” says report co-author Dean Baker, who testified last month before the Senate Special Committee on Aging. “This is compounded by the recent collapse of the stock market. The result is that many baby boomers will only have entitlements to rely on in their retirement.”
Make that entitlements, roommates, and each other.
As more and more boomers scale down their retirement plans and consider alternative living arrangements, it’s worth asking: Is shared housing such a bad thing for aging boomers? Does a return to the Communal idea, borne of economic necessity, also have emotional, social, and environmental benefits? Why wait for the retirement home or hospice to live with other people? With the nation full of worthless, ridiculously large, and mostly empty houses, why not fill them with the newly penurious and like-minded boomers in need of housing?
Better yet: why not abandon these suburban houses altogether, and find more appropriate housing arrangements closer to urban cores, or build tightly knit communities on cheap rural land?
Boomers are the “hippies” of the 60s who made communal life popular. Can they use this experience to salvage their old age?“Cooperation is the watershed in grappling with this economic downturn,” says Charles Durrett, of McCamant & Durrett, a pioneering architectural firm that specializes in ecologically sensitive shared housing projects for seniors and low-income people. “It doesn’t make any sense — economically, emotionally, environmentally — for retired people to be living in these isolated homes and ranchettes, making thousands of individual trips to the grocery store and pharmacy.”
Terry S., a 62-year-old self-employed divorced psychologist in Pittsburgh, is one boomer considering the cooperative housing route. Until the crisis hit last year, Terry planned to spend her retirement between Europe and New York City, living off her IRA and savings. But the crash saw her wealth plummet by 60 percent. “My friends and I feel betrayed because we are now in the same or worse position than those who never saved their money, but may have a pension,” she says. The crisis forced her to rethink retirement, and now plans to buy a house with her friends. She explains the logic:
Some of my friends and I shared a communal house in the 70s. We first came up with this idea [of doing it again] when we were talking about the possibility of having to live in assisted living or nursing homes, and we decided it would be far better to all live together in a big house with friends we knew and loved and hire a nurse and a cook. One of my friends owns a construction firm and he says he can put an elevator in any home for less than $100,000. We have looked at several homes. One was a beautiful house that backed onto a huge city park and had a pool decks all around and could easily be converted into four private residences. It was $600,000, which would only be $150,000 per unit. Much less than the $4,000 a month to have half of a dingy room in a nursing home that smells like urine.
For those who can’t afford to buy a comfortable retirement home with friends, there is a proliferating number of larger, shared-income communities with low financial thresholds. Known as “Intentional CommunitiesÓ these small village-like settlements allow like-minded retirees to pool their economic resources and support each other during their “second journey.” While historically there has been no direct correlation between economic conditions and growth in America’s commune movement — the greatest spike occurring during the boom decade between 1965 and 1975 — the current economic downturn is dovetailing with a rise in the number of such communities around the country.
“…only be $150,000 per unit… Much less than the $4,000 a month to have half of a dingy room in a nursing home that smells like urine…”
“We are in a period of elevated interest in intentional communities,” says Laird Schaub, executive director of the Fellowship for Intentional Communities. “There is no statistically meaningful data since the crisis began, but the after a lull in the 80s and 90s, the last decade has seen growing numbers of people in their 50s interested in this way of life.”
Tony Sirna, a veteran of communes and the Fellowship’s web manager, says that while many people are currently drawn to income-sharing communities because of financial straights, he suspects many will stay on because of the social and cultural benefits of living with others and sharing resources.
“As a generation, boomers have a unique relationship to the idea of Community,” says Sirna. “Partly because of the Counterculture, many retirees are choosing to create non-corporate senior cohousing, as opposed to traditional senior communities in which they feel institutionalized.” Sirna says many shared-income communities are now at maximum capacity for the first time in decades, with waiting lists full of retirees eager to live the shared, cooperative life.
If the deepening economic crisis does lead the boomers back to Countercultural values, a generation will have come full circle. Whether they end up living in a group house, a shared apartment, or a full-on hippie-style commune, studies show that they will live longer and more fulfilling later lives. “The results here are truly amazing,” says Kirby Dunn, pointing to studies that gauge the effects of shared housing. “Across all programs and age-brackets, people say they feel safer, are less lonely, happier, and sleep better. They also call their family less often for help.”
This last item is of particular interest to the boomers’ kids. They may not have made it to the mortgage stage of the game before the crisis hit, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have their own problems at the moment.